For many of human history, the concept work needs to be “enjoyable” would have appeared, at finest, absurd and, at worst, offensive. Contemplate a Roman galley slave chained to an oar, or a medieval serf certain to land and lord, or a Nineteenth-century textile mill employee inhaling lint in a windowless manufacturing facility.
Even professions we now romanticize—similar to blacksmiths, sailors, or early physicians—concerned lengthy hours, excessive threat, and minimal autonomy. Work was, in essence, a needed burden: harmful, monotonous, and barely chosen. The notion that it must also be considerably pleasing would have appeared like asking for dessert throughout a famine.
In opposition to that backdrop, the previous century, and particularly the past two decades, symbolize a exceptional deviation. Work, not less than for a section of the worldwide workforce, has been reimagined not merely as tolerable however as doubtlessly fulfilling, even pleasurable. Workplaces started to resemble grownup playgrounds. Silicon Valley companies led the cost, providing sushi cooks, kombucha on faucet, nap pods, on-site gyms, and curated social occasions. The rise (and at instances weaponization) of “tradition” as a company asset reframed employment as an expertise, not only a transaction. Parallel to this, the growth of worker wellness programs, versatile schedules, and distant or hybrid work blurred the boundary between skilled and private life.
Work itself additionally underwent a refined rebranding. Careers had been now not merely jobs; they turned autos for id, function, and self-expression. Staff had been inspired to “bring their whole selves to work” to be able to search which means in what they did, and to count on that their employer would facilitate private progress. Organizations, in flip, more and more borrowed from the logic of client markets: Staff became internal customers and had been provided entry to teaching, management talks, curated studying journeys, and even quasi-membership communities.
{“blockType”:”mv-promo-block”,”information”:{“imageDesktopUrl”:”https://photographs.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-16X9.jpg”,”imageMobileUrl”:”https://photographs.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-1×1-2.jpg”,”eyebrow”:””,”headline”:”Get extra insights from Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic”,”dek”:”Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic is the Chief Science Officer at Russell Reynolds, a professor of organizational psychology at UCL and Columbia College, and the co-founder of DeeperSignals. He has authored 15 books and over 250 scientific articles on the psychology of expertise, management, AI, and entrepreneurship. “,”subhed”:””,”description”:””,”ctaText”:”Study Extra”,”ctaUrl”:”https://drtomas.com/intro/”,”theme”:{“bg”:”#2b2d30″,”textual content”:”#ffffff”,”eyebrow”:”#9aa2aa”,”subhed”:”#ffffff”,”buttonBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonHoverBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonText”:”#ffffff”},”imageDesktopId”:91424798,”imageMobileId”:91424800,”shareable”:false,”slug”:””,”wpCssClasses”:””}}
There was additionally, for a time, a distinctly performative ethos: the rise of the “work hard, play hard” tradition. Popularized within the late twentieth century and institutionalized in consulting companies, funding banks, and later tech corporations, it promised depth offset by indulgence. Lengthy hours could be compensated with workforce off-sites, lavish events, and a way of camaraderie cast below strain. In principle, it was a cut price. In apply, it typically turned asymmetrical. The “play” proved episodic, the “work” everlasting. As know-how dissolved temporal boundaries, the cut price eroded additional. In the present day, for a lot of, the tradition has quietly mutated into one thing much less balanced: work arduous, then stay on name.
This trajectory would have puzzled John Maynard Keynes, who famously predicted in his 1930 essay “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren” that technological progress would scale back the workweek to roughly 15 hours by the flip of the millennium. He was not fully fallacious about productivity beneficial properties. What he underestimated was our capability to transform effectivity into increased expectations somewhat than better leisure. As an alternative of working much less, we’ve chosen—or been nudged—to work in another way, and infrequently extra.
An unsentimental actuality
But, as with most utopian initiatives, the wonderful print issues. Beneath the floor of kombucha faucets and mindfulness periods lies a much less sentimental actuality. Many of those initiatives weren’t purely altruistic however instrumental. Making work extra pleasing also can make employees more productive, extra loyal and, crucially, extra accessible. In case your workplace has the whole lot you want, why depart? In case your job is your id, why change off? The danger shouldn’t be merely longer hours however a deeper type of entanglement: the emergence of what one may name the spiritual workaholic, somebody who doesn’t really feel coerced however nonetheless can not disengage.
On the identical time, the standardization of efficiency has intensified. Metrics, dashboards, and analytics more and more govern how work is evaluated. Even ostensibly artistic roles are decomposed into measurable outputs. Know-how has amplified this pattern. The smartphone (and for these of you sufficiently old, keep in mind the Blackberry?) ensured that work adopted us residence. Synthetic intelligence now ensures that it follows us into our considering. Duties that when required judgment are more and more automated or augmented, typically lowering the scope for discretion and experimentation.
The result’s a paradox. Work has by no means appeared extra pleasing on the floor, but many report feeling much less engaged, much less artistic, and extra replaceable. Analysis on job polarization and automation means that as routine cognitive duties are digitized, human labor turns into both extremely specialized or increasingly commoditized. Generative AI accelerates this dynamic by making data extra accessible but additionally extra interchangeable. When everybody can produce competent output, the marginal worth of particular person contribution declines.
Measurable advantages
In such an surroundings, “enjoyable” dangers changing into one other managed variable, one thing to be optimized somewhat than skilled. Worse, it might be crowded out fully. Effectivity, in spite of everything, shouldn’t be notably playful. The trade-off between effectivity and humanism turns into acute. As organizations pursue ever better productiveness, they might inadvertently strip work of the very qualities that made it partaking: autonomy, mastery, and social connection.
This issues as a result of, opposite to the historic norm, enjoyable at work shouldn’t be merely a luxurious. A considerable physique of analysis suggests it has measurable advantages.
First, meta-analytic proof reveals that optimistic have an effect on is related to increased job efficiency, notably in roles requiring creativity and problem-solving.
Second, studies on engagement persistently discover that workers who expertise enjoyment and curiosity of their work are extra productive and fewer prone to depart.
Third, analysis on psychological security, led by Harvard Enterprise Faculty professor Amy Edmondson, signifies that environments the place folks really feel snug and relaxed foster studying and innovation.
Fourth, meta-analyses on intrinsic motivation, similar to these by psychologists Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, present that enjoyment derived from the duty itself predicts persistence and efficiency higher than exterior rewards.
Nonetheless, the need for enjoyable shouldn’t be common. Cultural norms form how acceptable it’s to show enjoyment at work. In some contexts, seen seriousness indicators professionalism; in others, it indicators rigidity. Particular person variations matter as effectively. Character traits similar to extraversion and openness are related to a better need for stimulation and novelty, whereas conscientious people could derive satisfaction from construction and achievement somewhat than amusement.
Self-assessment
A helpful approach to consider this isn’t whether or not work needs to be enjoyable, however how a lot enjoyable one wants from work. Contemplate a easy self-assessment:
1. Do you’re feeling energized by social interplay and novelty, or drained by it?
2. Do you search which means primarily via your profession, or outdoors it?
3. How vital is it that your work displays your id?
4. Would you like a secure, predictable position that permits leisure elsewhere, or a dynamic, immersive position that blurs boundaries?
5. Do you equate enjoyment with quick pleasure, or with long-term progress and mastery?
Those that rating excessive on the necessity for alignment between private id {and professional} position usually tend to search enjoyable, or not less than intrinsic satisfaction, of their work. Others could favor to deal with work instrumentally, as a method to fund a satisfying life elsewhere. Neither method is inherently superior, however confusion between them could be pricey.
What to do
What, then, is to be performed? Right here, insights from writer Dorie Clark’s work on long-term profession technique are instructive. One possibility is job crafting: intentionally reshaping facets of your present position to extend autonomy, selection, and which means. This may contain looking for initiatives that align together with your pursuits, renegotiating duties, or constructing relationships that make work extra partaking. Research suggests that even small modifications can considerably improve satisfaction and efficiency.
An alternative choice is strategic profession design. Fairly than chasing quick enjoyment, Clark advocates for a longer-term perspective: investing in expertise, relationships, and status that create future optionality. Paradoxically, this will likely contain durations of much less pleasing work within the brief time period, in service of better autonomy later. The secret’s intentionality. Enjoyable, on this view, shouldn’t be one thing one stumbles upon, however one thing one engineers over time.
It’s also value noting that even in environments that aren’t clearly “enjoyable,” folks can typically create pockets of enjoyment. A lot of this comes right down to colleagues. A robust workforce can rework even routine work into one thing tolerable, sometimes even pleasing. Shared humor, mutual help, and casual camaraderie typically matter greater than formal tradition initiatives. In that sense, enjoyable at work shouldn’t be at all times designed from the highest down; it’s regularly improvised from the underside up.
For these contemplating a extra radical shift, the query shouldn’t be merely “What could be enjoyable?” however “What sort of issues do I wish to spend my time fixing?” Sustainable enjoyment tends to come up not from perpetual leisure, however from significant problem. As a long time of analysis on movement have proven, individuals are happiest when they’re stretched however not overwhelmed, engaged however not bored.
The AI issue
Has synthetic intelligence killed enjoyable at work? Not fairly. But it surely has modified the situations below which enjoyable can emerge. By automating routine duties, it has the potential to free people for extra artistic and social actions. But, if deployed primarily for effectivity, it might as a substitute compress work into narrower, extra standardized types, leaving much less room for play.
The way forward for enjoyable at work, then, is unlikely to be decided by know-how alone. It would rely on decisions by organizations about the way to design roles, and by people about the way to have interaction with them. The historic arc suggests progress: from drudgery to dignity, from survival to, sometimes, satisfaction. Whether or not it extends to real enjoyment stays an open query.
Allow us to not neglect that work should still at all times be, effectively, work, as in one thing we do to receives a commission, if we’re fortunate sufficient. Unrealistic expectations about how a lot enjoyable one must have at work could be the worst enemy of all, and a dependable supply of disappointment.
As The Shining reminds us, “All work and no play …” is not only a warning about monotony, however about imbalance.
So, maybe the actual drawback shouldn’t be that work isn’t enjoyable sufficient, however that we’ve forgotten to hunt, defend, and worth the numerous different sources of enjoyable that life so generously affords past it?
{“blockType”:”mv-promo-block”,”information”:{“imageDesktopUrl”:”https://photographs.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-16X9.jpg”,”imageMobileUrl”:”https://photographs.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-1×1-2.jpg”,”eyebrow”:””,”headline”:”Get extra insights from Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic”,”dek”:”Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic is the Chief Science Officer at Russell Reynolds, a professor of organizational psychology at UCL and Columbia College, and the co-founder of DeeperSignals. He has authored 15 books and over 250 scientific articles on the psychology of expertise, management, AI, and entrepreneurship. “,”subhed”:””,”description”:””,”ctaText”:”Study Extra”,”ctaUrl”:”https://drtomas.com/intro/”,”theme”:{“bg”:”#2b2d30″,”textual content”:”#ffffff”,”eyebrow”:”#9aa2aa”,”subhed”:”#ffffff”,”buttonBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonHoverBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonText”:”#ffffff”},”imageDesktopId”:91424798,”imageMobileId”:91424800,”shareable”:false,”slug”:””,”wpCssClasses”:””}}
