Generative AI has made it potential for people to carry out duties that once required entire teams. In the present day, a single marketer can produce marketing campaign belongings, analyze knowledge, and generate content material at scale. A product supervisor can prototype, check, and iterate with out counting on engineering; and builders can ship reams of high-quality code written by machines. The result’s the rise of the “superpowered individual” who can do the work of many.
It’s tempting to extrapolate from this that human collaboration is changing into out of date. If AI can replicate or increase the cognitive contributions of a number of people, why hassle with the friction of teamwork in any respect?
In our work with high firms—Tomas as an organizational psychologist and creator of I, Human: AI, Automation, and the Quest to Reclaim What Makes Us Unique, and Dorie as a keynote speaker and guide for firms reinventing themselves within the face of AI—we’ve encountered a variety of experimentation, with firms utilizing brokers to stress-test technique, ship key capabilities reminiscent of finance and operations, and function quasi-autonomous development teams.
{“blockType”:”mv-promo-block”,”knowledge”:{“imageDesktopUrl”:”https://photos.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-16X9.jpg”,”imageMobileUrl”:”https://photos.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-1×1-2.jpg”,”eyebrow”:””,”headline”:”Get extra insights from Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic”,”dek”:”Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic is the chief science officer at Russell Reynolds, a professor of organizational psychology at UCL and Columbia College, and the cofounder of DeeperSignals. He has authored 15 books and over 250 scientific articles on the psychology of expertise, management, AI, and entrepreneurship. “,”subhed”:””,”description”:””,”ctaText”:”Study Extra”,”ctaUrl”:”https://drtomas.com/intro/”,”theme”:{“bg”:”#2b2d30″,”textual content”:”#ffffff”,”eyebrow”:”#9aa2aa”,”subhed”:”#ffffff”,”buttonBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonHoverBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonText”:”#ffffff”},”imageDesktopId”:91424798,”imageMobileId”:91424800,”shareable”:false,”slug”:””,”wpCssClasses”:””}}
Nonetheless, we consider that teamwork is right here to remain—although AI will virtually actually reshape it. Particularly, we consider teamwork will shift in three key methods:
1. Group composition will change. Groups are more likely to turn into smaller (and maybe extra nimble) as a result of people can do extra on their very own, and groups might embrace each human and nonhuman contributors. In consequence, it received’t be adequate for a couple of folks to be “good with AI.” AI literacy has to turn into a core staff functionality, not a person talent. Groups want shared norms round rising matters like:
- When to depend on AI (and when to not);
- Understanding the difference and trade-offs between pace and high quality, effectivity and accuracy, low-value and high-value work; and
- interrogate AI’s outputs and mix them with human judgment.
Efficient groups might want to develop a mechanism for rewarding folks not only for utilizing AI effectively, however for recognizing when it’s mistaken. In follow, that will imply making “AI skepticism” a proper a part of efficiency analysis.
2. The main target of groups will change. In the present day, many groups deal with logistical points—a hodgepodge of study, reporting, and coordination throughout divisions and departments. (Standing replace, anybody?) That type of task-based teamwork might quickly be out of date, as a result of AI can deal with it sooner and extra effectively.
However teamwork was by no means simply about job execution—and within the AI period, teamwork will evolve right into a higher-value exercise that unlocks new potentialities for organizations. Certainly, as transactional collaboration declines, relational collaboration turns into extra essential.
Leaders ought to put money into trust-building intentionally: fewer however higher-quality interactions, extra in-person time when potential, and structured alternatives for disagreement. Psychological security issues, however so does mental friction. The aim just isn’t concord, however productive battle.
On account of this variation, teamwork is more likely to really feel more and more significant—like a core part of each your job and your professional identity. When you may join deeply with different folks by shared objectives and actions, it turns into a extremely significant expertise that will increase loyalty to your staff and your organization.
3. The function of leaders will even shift. Leaders within the AI period might want to make three main modifications in how they information their staff members. Particularly, which means:
- Changing into extra intentional about focusing the staff on high-value work. With AI dealing with extra of the analytical and operational workload, leaders might want to redesign groups round judgment, not duties. Groups must be explicitly chartered round higher-order objectives: framing issues, making trade-offs, and aligning on priorities. In different phrases, the “comfortable” abilities of management might turn into the hardest to replace. A easy rule is that if a gathering may very well be changed by an AI-generated abstract, it most likely must be.
- Reconceptualizing your function as an orchestrator, not the supply of solutions. Leaders ought to start to think about themselves because the architects of how people and machines work collectively. Meaning clarifying roles between AI and folks, setting resolution rights, and guaranteeing accountability. It additionally requires resisting the temptation to defer to AI when stakes are excessive. Judgment, not output, stays the chief’s final duty.
- Measuring what truly issues. In lots of organizations, efficiency remains to be evaluated based on visible activity moderately than high quality of pondering. In an AI-enabled world, this turns into harmful. Leaders ought to shift metrics towards resolution high quality, studying pace, and long-term outcomes, moderately than short-term productiveness beneficial properties.
Briefly, the previous teamwork of processing and coordination is on its means out. However the brand new teamwork—built-in with AI and suffused with human expertise and judgment—might be extra important than ever, and organizations might want to determine the best way to evolve.
The chance just isn’t that AI will destroy teamwork, however that it’ll expose how a lot of what we now have beforehand known as teamwork was by no means that valuable to begin with. The chance is to rebuild it round what people do finest: pondering critically, connecting meaningfully, and deciding properly in order that the sum of a staff is bigger than its components.
{“blockType”:”mv-promo-block”,”knowledge”:{“imageDesktopUrl”:”https://photos.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-16X9.jpg”,”imageMobileUrl”:”https://photos.fastcompany.com/picture/add/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit/wp-cms-2/2025/10/tcp-photo-syndey-1×1-2.jpg”,”eyebrow”:””,”headline”:”Get extra insights from Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic”,”dek”:”Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic is the chief science officer at Russell Reynolds, a professor of organizational psychology at UCL and Columbia College, and the cofounder of DeeperSignals. He has authored 15 books and over 250 scientific articles on the psychology of expertise, management, AI, and entrepreneurship. “,”subhed”:””,”description”:””,”ctaText”:”Study Extra”,”ctaUrl”:”https://drtomas.com/intro/”,”theme”:{“bg”:”#2b2d30″,”textual content”:”#ffffff”,”eyebrow”:”#9aa2aa”,”subhed”:”#ffffff”,”buttonBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonHoverBg”:”#3b3f46″,”buttonText”:”#ffffff”},”imageDesktopId”:91424798,”imageMobileId”:91424800,”shareable”:false,”slug”:””,”wpCssClasses”:””}}
