When the Nobel Prize Committee Rejected The Lord of the Rings: Tolkien “Has Not Measured As much as Storytelling of the Highest High quality” (1961)

admin
6 Min Read


When J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings books appeared within the mid-Nineteen Fifties, they had been met with very combined critiques, an unsur­pris­ing recep­tion giv­en that noth­ing like them had been writ­ten for grownup learn­ers since Edmund Spenser’s epic sixteenth cen­tu­ry Eng­lish poem The Faerie Queene, per­haps. At the least, this was the con­tention of evaluation­er Richard Hugh­es, who went on to put in writing that “for width of imag­i­na­tion,” The Lord of the Rings “virtually beg­gars par­al­lel.”

Scot­tish author Nao­mi Mitchi­son did discover a com­par­i­son: to Sir Thomas Mal­o­ry, creator of the fifteenth cen­tu­ry Le Morte d’Arthur — onerous­ly mis­positioned, giv­en Tolkien’s day job as an Oxford don of Eng­lish lit­er­a­ture, however not the kind of factor that handed for con­tem­po­rary writ­ing within the Nineteen Fifties, notwith­stand­ing the seri­ous appre­ci­a­tion of writ­ers like W.H. Auden for Tolkien’s tril­o­gy. “No pre­vi­ous author,” the poet remarked in a New York Instances evaluation, “has, to my knowl­edge, cre­at­ed an imag­i­nary world and a feigned his­to­ry in such element.”

Auden did discover fault with Tolkien’s poet­ry, a truth upon which crit­ic Edmund Wil­son seized in his scathing 1956 Lord of the Rings review. “Mr. Auden is appar­ent­ly fairly insen­si­tive — via lack of inter­est within the oth­er depart­ment,” wrote Wil­son, “to the truth that Tolkien’s prose is simply as unhealthy. Prose and verse are on the identical lev­el of professional­fes­so­r­i­al ama­teur­ish­ness.” 5 years lat­er, the Nobel prize jury would make the identical choose­ment once they exclud­ed Tolkien’s books from con­sid­er­a­tion. Tolkien’s prose, wrote jury mem­ber Anders Öster­ling, “has not in any manner mea­sured as much as sto­ry­telling of the excessive­est qual­i­ty.”

The word was dis­cov­ered latest­ly by Swedish jour­nal­ist Andreas Ekström, who delved into the Nobel archive for 1961 and located that “the jury handed over names includ­ing Lawrence Dur­rell, Robert Frost, Gra­ham Greene, E.M. Forster, and Tolkien to provide you with their even­tu­al win­ner, Yugosla­vian author Ivo Andrić,” as Ali­son Flood reports at The Guardian. (The Nobel archives are sealed till 50 years after the yr the award is giv­en.) Ekström has been learn­ing via the archives “for the previous 5 years or so,” he says, “and this was the primary time I’ve seen Tolkien’s identify among the many sug­gest­ed can­di­dates.” His identify appeared on the checklist mainly via the machi­na­tions of his clos­est pal and chief sup­port­er, C.S. Lewis.

Lewis, “additionally of Oxford,” Wil­son sneered, “is ready to high all of them” in reward of Tolkien’s books. From the primary seem­ance of his Mid­dle Earth fan­ta­sy in The Hob­bit, Lewis promised to “do all in my pow­er to safe for Tolkien’s nice e-book the recog­ni­tion it deserves,” as he wrote in a 1953 let­ter to British pub­lish­er Stan­ley Unwin. In what is likely to be con­sid­ered an uneth­i­cal professional­mo­tion of his pal’s work at present, Lewis reply­ed tire­much less­ly to crit­ics of the tril­o­gy, going to date, after the pub­li­ca­tion of The Two Tow­ers, to pen an essay on the sub­ject titled “The Dethrone­ment of Pow­er.” Right here, Lewis explains the professional­lix qual­i­ty of Tolkien’s prose — that which crit­ics referred to as “tedious” — as a nar­ra­tive neces­si­ty: “I don’t assume he might have carried out it any oth­er manner.”

Tolkien’s largest fan additionally urged learn­ers to spend extra time with the books and promised that the rewards could be nice. In protection of the sec­ond work of the tril­o­gy, he con­clud­ed, “the e-book is simply too orig­i­nal and too opu­lent for any ultimate judg­ment on a primary learn­ing. However we all know without delay that it has carried out issues to us. We’re not fairly the identical males. And although we should ration our­selves in our reread­ings, I’ve lit­tle doubt that the e-book will quickly take its place among the many indis­pens­ables.” And so has all of Tolkien’s work, becom­ing the lit­er­ary stan­dard by which high fan­ta­sy is mea­sured, with or with­out a Nobel prize.

Word: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this submit appeared on our web site in 2021.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

J.R.R. Tolkien Snubs a Ger­man Pub­lish­er Ask­ing for Proof of His “Aryan Descent” (1938)

110 Draw­ings and Paint­ings by J.R.R. Tolkien: Of Mid­dle-Earth and Beyond

J.R.R. Tolkien Expressed a “Heart­felt Loathing” for Walt Dis­ney and Refused to Let Dis­ney Stu­dios Adapt His Work

Dis­cov­er J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lit­tle-Known and Hand-Illus­trat­ed Children’s Book, Mr. Bliss

When J.R.R. Tolkien Worked for the Oxford Eng­lish Dic­tio­nary and “Learned More … Than Any Oth­er Equal Peri­od of My Life” (1919–1920)

Josh Jones is a author and musi­cian based mostly in Durham, NC. 





Source link

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *